I really have a hard time with the idea that another terrorist attack on U.S. soil would be of benefit to the Republican candidate. Why is that the logical conclusion?
Is the point being made that American's are such lemmings that they would fail to recognize the basic FACT that not one but TWO attacks had occurred on U.S. soil while the Republicans were in charge? That they would be so overcome by fear that they would fail to put two and two together and conclude that the Republicans had in fact FAILED to keep us safe? Are we too stupid to digest the facts and then to hold the party in power accountable by tossing them out?
I don't understand the logic in the argument that it would be a win for Republicans so someone who does understand it ---- for God sakes .... EXPLAIN IT TO ME!!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment